|
Research This section provides some of the latest research about school improvement including curriculum alignment, formative assessment, and teacher quality.  | |  | | Title: | Using Classroom Assessment to Improve Teaching | | Author: | The Center for Comprehensive School Reform and Improvement | | Source: | Newsletter | | Date: | December, 2006 | | Argues that both summative and formative assessments are important and that teachers should use assessment not only to actively and continuously measure a learner’s progress but also to acquire useful data to inform their own instructional practice. Provides guidelines for developing effective formative assessments. | |  | |  | |  | | Title: | Closing the Achievement Gap by Detracking | | Author: | Carol Corbett Burris and Kevin G. Welner | | Source: | Phi Delta Kappan | | Date: | April 2005 | | Achievement follows from opportunities, Ms. Burris and Mr. Welner assert, and the persistent practice of tracking denies a range of opportunities to large numbers of students. That a disproportionate number of these students are minorities is one of the underlying reasons that the achievement gap has remained so persistent. The authors describe how a diverse suburban district in New York narrowed the gap by offering its high-track curriculum to all students. | |  | | Title: | Formative Classroom Assessment and Benjamin S. Bloom: Theory, Research, and Implications | | Author: | Thomas R. Guskey | | Source: | Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada. | | Date: | April 2005 | | Reviews the work of renowned educator Benjamin Bloom on the problem associated with the achievement gap. Bloom argued that to reduce variation in students’ achievement and to have all students learn well, we must increase variation in instructional approaches and learning time. The key element in this effort was well constructed, formative classroom assessments. Bloom outlined a specific strategy for using formative classroom assessments to guide teachers in differentiating their instruction and labeled it “mastery learning.” This paper describes Bloom’s work, presents the essential elements of mastery learning, explains common misinterpretations, and describes the results of research on its effects. |
| 
|
|
|